今天又泡了图书馆半天了。
看了很多文章，
灵感似泉源般源源不绝。
真的很兴奋。
但可惜，
想找个人来高谈阔论都没有=(
虽然有几个好朋友在这儿，
但总觉得他们不是很喜欢听我那沉闷的哲学和思想。
真的。。。真的。。。失落感很大。。
Friday, October 29, 2010
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
Bullshit!
Our PM of Malaysia told us that we need changes.
Changes to increase our average wages,
and
in turn improve our standards of living.
He said our coming nationally financial budget (that's financial budget of 2011) would be the turning point of our economy.
Well,
he sounds so transformational.
Unfortunately,
the report that he presented few days ago,
I could just say,
'Bullshit!'
The following sections would illustrates the flaws of this BULLSHIT this latest financial budget.
IT IS ABOUT FAIRNESS!
In his report, it mentions that all government servants would be rewarded RM500 REGARDLESS OF THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS TO THEIR DUTIES!
Obviously,
this distributive injustice is not encouraging efficiency.
Notably, our government has promised us to enhance the fairness and the efficiency of the overall society.
Think about the financial budget and consider:
Whether has the government walked to its talk?
Also, this report announces that the reduction of taxes of luxury goods,
whilst increasing the service tax to offset the reduction.
Apparently,
there is another serious tax injustice.
Well,
I know you guys have heard about Robin Hood's story.
He looted the rich for the poor.
However, I have never heard Robin Hood looted the poor for the rich.
In ethical sense,
it is obivously unfair for those poor to pay more taxes to subsidy the rich!
ANOTHER WHITE ELEPHANT?
Government said we are lacking of money.
That is why it is imperative to cut public subsidies, such as petrol subsidy, sugar subsidy and others.
I totally understand the point of reduction.
The purpose is to reduce the dependency of the nations toward government and in turn improve the competitiveness.
BUT,
it does not serve as the ground for increasing the subsidies on developing the white elephant project.
I couldn't really foresee any benefit of spending of RM 5 billion for the 100-level building in KL.
There will not be a substantial increase in the number of tourists after the development of the building.
Although, technically, spending money on development would stimulate the economy, it does not mean the any stimulation would work practically.
Instead of spending 5billion dollars on this white elephant,
perhaps it should use this money to invest on education to strengthen the knowledge of the citizens and in turn enhance the national human capital, which is crucial for the success of the nation in global stage.
Clearly,
it shows the incompetency of the senior-level executives within the public sector.
Or else,
it shows the corruptibilitty of these people that only care about their wallets as they intentionally choose to build white elephant, although they know there are always other better alternatives for them to choose.
BULLSHIT!
Regretly,
this financial budget is shit worse than many assignments practised by the students majoring in economics.
Even a management student like me also can generate a sound more reasonable proposal than the government one.
SO IT IS JUST A BULLSHIT!
ANOTHER WHITE ELEPHANT?
Government said we are lacking of money.
That is why it is imperative to cut public subsidies, such as petrol subsidy, sugar subsidy and others.
I totally understand the point of reduction.
The purpose is to reduce the dependency of the nations toward government and in turn improve the competitiveness.
BUT,
it does not serve as the ground for increasing the subsidies on developing the white elephant project.
I couldn't really foresee any benefit of spending of RM 5 billion for the 100-level building in KL.
There will not be a substantial increase in the number of tourists after the development of the building.
Although, technically, spending money on development would stimulate the economy, it does not mean the any stimulation would work practically.
Instead of spending 5billion dollars on this white elephant,
perhaps it should use this money to invest on education to strengthen the knowledge of the citizens and in turn enhance the national human capital, which is crucial for the success of the nation in global stage.
Clearly,
it shows the incompetency of the senior-level executives within the public sector.
Or else,
it shows the corruptibilitty of these people that only care about their wallets as they intentionally choose to build white elephant, although they know there are always other better alternatives for them to choose.
BULLSHIT!
Regretly,
this financial budget is shit worse than many assignments practised by the students majoring in economics.
Even a management student like me also can generate a sound more reasonable proposal than the government one.
SO IT IS JUST A BULLSHIT!
Monday, October 18, 2010
鄭丁賢‧乾杯，預算案
其實，這是一個不錯的預算案。
如果你是村裡的頭子，或是宗教師，你得到800令吉津貼。
如果是一般公務員，你有500令吉的援助金。
如果你是女性公務員，你可以享受90天的產假。
如果你是超級建築商，你有機會參與100層摩天樓，以及各項超級計劃。
如果你是印尼勞工，你也有機會參與100層摩天樓，以及各種超級計劃。
如果不是如果。
因為你很可能不是村長、宗教師、待產女公務員，也極少可能是大型建商，或印尼勞工。
你和多數人一樣，只是中等收入的受薪階級，或是一個奔波忙碌，但沒有特殊管道，始終未能發達的中小企業主。
於是，你會問說，預算案怎麼樣，和我有甚麼關係？
當然也有好處。
大道5年內不漲價，替你省下未來的部份費用。不過，對不起，政府不能買下大道，給你免費通行。
政府必須增加收入，所以，服務稅提高到6%，你上到哪兒，都是如影隨形；即使呆在家裡，只要打開收費電視，也躲不了這6%。
其實，多數人想要的是減稅。
國外許多政府，都是通過減稅來減輕中等收入人民的負擔，以及刺激企業的活力。
不過，個人所得稅和公司稅都是堅守陣地，人民得共赴時艱，多盡國民義務。
首次購屋的印花稅降低，可以省下二、三千令吉；但是，巴生河流域地區的屋價，隨便都漲了幾萬。你有？付印花稅，但沒能力買屋子。
而依特利斯之前說，如果不撙節開支，大馬會像希臘一樣破產。
但是，預算案的內容，比過去更高（50億令吉100層摩天樓）、更大（100億令吉雙溪毛糯發展計劃、30億令吉沙巴生態度假村、400億令吉大眾捷運）。
人們還以為，政府要縮小;但是，和預算案一樣，政府好像是膨脹了。
是的，國家經濟要轉型，人民收入要在2020年翻倍，不要困在中等收入的牢籠裡。
2011年財政預算案，應該是轉型的起點，政府要把錢用在刀口上，每一令吉都要發揮價值。
預算案應該要有更多具體的改革開放措施。
生產力不會出現在鄉村委員會和宗教師的津貼上，競爭力不是反映在100層高的摩天樓之中。
它們是隱藏在國民的生產力，企業的競爭力，以及政府的效率。
作為第十大馬計劃的開始，明年的預算案應該投資在提高教育素質，振興企業，以及加強外資的信心。
但是，總是有好消息，譬如，酒類沒有漲價；暫時拋開煩惱，大家舉起酒杯，飲勝。
因為你很可能不是村長、宗教師、待產女公務員，也極少可能是大型建商，或印尼勞工。
你和多數人一樣，只是中等收入的受薪階級，或是一個奔波忙碌，但沒有特殊管道，始終未能發達的中小企業主。
於是，你會問說，預算案怎麼樣，和我有甚麼關係？
當然也有好處。
大道5年內不漲價，替你省下未來的部份費用。不過，對不起，政府不能買下大道，給你免費通行。
政府必須增加收入，所以，服務稅提高到6%，你上到哪兒，都是如影隨形；即使呆在家裡，只要打開收費電視，也躲不了這6%。
其實，多數人想要的是減稅。
國外許多政府，都是通過減稅來減輕中等收入人民的負擔，以及刺激企業的活力。
不過，個人所得稅和公司稅都是堅守陣地，人民得共赴時艱，多盡國民義務。
首次購屋的印花稅降低，可以省下二、三千令吉；但是，巴生河流域地區的屋價，隨便都漲了幾萬。你有？付印花稅，但沒能力買屋子。
而依特利斯之前說，如果不撙節開支，大馬會像希臘一樣破產。
但是，預算案的內容，比過去更高（50億令吉100層摩天樓）、更大（100億令吉雙溪毛糯發展計劃、30億令吉沙巴生態度假村、400億令吉大眾捷運）。
人們還以為，政府要縮小;但是，和預算案一樣，政府好像是膨脹了。
是的，國家經濟要轉型，人民收入要在2020年翻倍，不要困在中等收入的牢籠裡。
2011年財政預算案，應該是轉型的起點，政府要把錢用在刀口上，每一令吉都要發揮價值。
預算案應該要有更多具體的改革開放措施。
生產力不會出現在鄉村委員會和宗教師的津貼上，競爭力不是反映在100層高的摩天樓之中。
它們是隱藏在國民的生產力，企業的競爭力，以及政府的效率。
作為第十大馬計劃的開始，明年的預算案應該投資在提高教育素質，振興企業，以及加強外資的信心。
但是，總是有好消息，譬如，酒類沒有漲價；暫時拋開煩惱，大家舉起酒杯，飲勝。
Sunday, October 17, 2010
这学期的第一个优等分
这学期不知怎么的，
连续拚了十一个礼拜，
竟然一个优等分都拿不到。
幸好这星期的第一天，
学校派了最新报告的分数回来。
拿了83.5分^ ^
还要全班最高><
开心死了！！！
加上我辅导的两个朋友都分别拿到优异的分数。
可说是三喜临门 =D
哈哈哈~
爸爸的生日快到了，
打算把我的分数邮寄过去当作生日礼物=）
Friday, October 8, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)